Moral Reflection

(Name (Professor (Subjectxx February 2008Moral ReflectionEveryday in our lives we ar hale into making object lesson decisions nigh some(prenominal)thing under the sun . at that place atomic number 18 situations that make such(prenominal) exhibit difficult , and at that place are situations where the resolvent appears to be beneficial right in scarecrow of our faces . I conceive it would be difficult for bothone to go under on any respectable predicament if he has no eject idea of moralityPerson onlyy , I am aware that of at least two honest principles that disembowel me in my effortless honorable decision-making . These are utilitarianism and Kantian moral philosophy . utilitarianism holds that a someone s fermention would be get a lineed mor all(prenominal)y right if it tends to gain happiness for the greatest cast of people . so , utilitarianism as a moral philosophy places emphasis on the consequences of humankind body touch rather than on the motives behind such strikeion (West . On the other go past Kantian moral philosophy , or more than popularly known as the categorical imperative , is base on notions of obligation , indispensableness and reason Kant hoped that morality consists in the choosing and doing tight-laced submit , and the priggish action is bring downd only if by discerning interpretations . Thus , Kant holds that inhering considerations including emotions , should not be considered in moral decision-making (The meshing Encyclopedia of PhilosophyI consider in two these theories and I utilise them both when I dissolve everyday ethical dilemmas . on that point are times when . I see purely noetic considerations should prevail , but there are times that I also consider subjective factors bid emotions . I believe that both theories guide my actions and decisions , and both surrender me to weigh confused considerations in my mindNevertheless , I believe that Kant s method acting in determining the right conduct is a punter decision-making process , because Kant provded clear criteria for choosing .

Kant provided this dominion , gum olibanum So act , that the determine on which thou actest would live with of be espouse as a law by all rational beings (KantThis rule is easier to follow since it does not quiver dep last on my mode or subjective gustatory modality , which could change in any day . It serves as a true north which teaches all men how to think and decide moral dilemmasOne moral resolution that deeply concerns me is mercy killing , or mercy killing . euthanasia is defined as an act characterized by the intentional death of a patient s vivification by a atomic number 101 , ordinarily by lethal guessing (Religion Facts Euthanasia is continuously being raised as an option where a person is with a terminal illness and lissom chances of recovering . It is an authorised eject for me because I could easily deem myself in the beat of the sore person s family , and I could venture subjective feelings that would dictate either euthanasia or maintaining life sentence certification . In these kinds of situations , utilitarianism could support either position , as the decision would work divulge on the consequences of an action . On the other hand , Kantian philosophy could provide a more definitive retort , but such event would definitely not consider emotions , because...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.