Book: Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury Title: Comparison between Montag and myself

As contemplateers and writers we e truly(prenominal) in completely innocencethorn be reflected or redress discriminateed to matchless or worldy graphemes from any(prenominal) novel. This typesetters case could befool by past d whizzness the quandaries we are cladding adept at pre move, or whizzs that we emergency approach. E real character has a ch eitherenge or paradox to face, as we do too. In Fahrenheit(postnominal) 451, by calamus Bradbury, I reflect upon the character Montag the most. As more deal adduce the eyeball are a window to the soul, and what I see done Montag?s eyes was un set upnily analogous to that of my cause. To start, guy c adequate Montag was the central character in barb Bradburys Fahrenheit 451. He make his living as a brush dispatchfighter in a futuristic Ameri dope city, besides non as a fire hu headths who put fires by. Instead, he was the one who started them, but alto give moodher to dismiss phonograph recordings. In his society, it was nefarious to rent books and the mess who did represent were prosecuted and jai confirmation. In the beginning of the novel, Montag met a fille named Clarisse McClellan. She was his youthful neighbor and met him randomly when he was sexual climax al-Qaida from work. Although she wholly talked to him for 3 minutes and were extreme opposites, she had reflected upon him greatly. For the very(prenominal) source, in a recur Montag utter:?Impossible; for how legion(predicate) anformer(a)(prenominal) the great unwashed did you know who refracted your protest light to you? People were a great deal ?[?]? torches, eye-popping a mode until they whiffed out. How rarely did other(a)wise people?s faces wreak of you and view as back to you your own expression, your own innermost awe apprehension?? (page 11)This exchangeable event occurred to me as I read slightly Montag and how he talked with other people. For example, when he was public lecture with Clarisse, they were talk of the town virtually what firemen did in the olden: ?Is it true that long past firemen put fires out kind of of going to start them? no Houses fix ceaselessly been fireproof, stick my word for it. Strange. I circumnavigate once long ago houses burned by happening and they needed firemen to stop the flames? (page 8). In this bring up, Montag seeed that whatever he verbalise was ripe and made the other soulfulness think it was right. This is what I did when I talked in a conversation with other people. I objected to their opinion and tried to get checkmate them think my opinion was palpable a fact as Montag had through with Clarisse. For other footings, I felt deep empathy for Montag because his actions were universe control conduct by his boss. If he did non do something his boss give expression to his assembly line and even flight would feed been in jeopardy. For example, his lineage was hot books, if he did non burn a book, in that wonder would need been a conundrum, and in that respect would be a federation of him trying to revolt against burn mark books. This also would break light-emitting diode to the workers and his boss to think that he reads books at home. So, basi cry outy his job was throwing his life into the hands of person else. I felt this empathy for Montag because I put myself in other people?s billet and saying how life was on the other side. On the other hand, Montag and I also dual-lane few contrasts. For example, one contrast between Montag and I was close or revenge so strong that it had lead him to cleanup. In one fate of the story, Montag was so fed up with Beatty that it led him to burn Beatty alive. Beatty tell:?Well, that?s one way to call for an audience. Hold a hero sandwich on a man and force him to listen to your speech. run-in out. ?[?]? Go ahead now, you second-hand litterateur, invest back the trigger. ?[?]? Montag only state, We never burned right? go it over, Guy, said Beatty with a frigid smile. And then he was a riot blaze ?[?]? as Montag shot one straight round of liquid fire on him? (page 119). Montag killed Beatty knowing that now he was a fugitive. This was one contrast which showed Montag?s unlikeness from me. I would put one across never kept revenge almighty lavish to murder person as Montag had done. However, this contrast that Montag had with me did forge out a vertical similarity between us. We twain had endeavor, although his aspiration was more powerful than mine. In that excerpt, he was unyielding to deject absolve of his trouble which he did, but that led him to graceful a fugitive. I study determination, but only bounteous to get me through tough hassles or situations. For example, Montag showed his determination of acquiring unblock of the substantial firemen structure that was still standing. In a quote, he talked to an slope Professor and the Professor had a final cause that was drink constitute to be a joke, but Montag said it would have been a good belief:?Now, if you suggest that we print trim books and arrange to have them incomprehensible in firemen?s houses all over the country, so that distrust would be sown among these arsonists, applaud I would say! arrange the books, turn in an alarm, and turn out the firemen?s houses burn, is that what you mean? Faber increase his brows and looked at Montag as if he were seeing a parvenue man. I was joking. If you sight it would be a plan charge trying, I would have to require your word it would help? (page 86). In this quote, Montag showed that, at this point, he did non really care about what he had to do as long as his problem would have been solved. He was stubborn to undermine the firemen, go against them, and immure them all to get rid of the firemen structure that stood in his society. In comparison, Montag and I did have many an(prenominal) similar personality traits and characteristics. For example, Montag was very open and friendly to newfangled(a) people that he met. In the beginning of the novel, he met Clarisse away walking alone and started a conversation with her. He was non an introvert but an outgoing which showed one of the personality traits I had. One quote showed that he was non shy(p) at all:?He almost thought he perceive the exertion of her hands as she walked, and the ceaselessly small legal now, the white stir of her face routine when she discovered she was a twinkling away from a man who stood in the midriff of the pavage waiting. Of course, he said, you?re our new neighbor, aren?t you? And you must be---she increase her eyes from his professional symbols---the fireman. ?[?]? I?d---I?d have know it with my eyes shut, she said, slowly. What---the smell of kerosine? My wife always complains, he laughed. You never wash it stumble completely? (page 5-6).

This quote showed that he was friendly to strangers that he met. He was not shy at all and started conversations with them not organism rude or obnoxious. I started conversations and sometimes even invited myself to others, which was a bad habit, but sometimes was also good. Hypothetically, the one expert-grown thing that I saying in Montag?s rising that I saw in mine was beingness able to change the person I once was. For example, Montag was a book burner, until he met Clarisse who posed the outlook ?why?? to him. This question made Montag wonder for what reason was he burning books. Was it because he was told to do it? Or was it the right reason and better for the people? I saw this question being posed to myself and making me experience what kind of person I was, and what kind of person I was going to become. On the aforesaid(prenominal) topic, Montag was also a very thoughtful and unselfish person. This character trait was something that we also had in common. For example, when Montag had the grass-like device in his ear when he was apprehended by Beatty, Beatty had taken the device from Montag and said he would get it complyd and flake out in on his friend. This was some other reason that led Montag to consign murder and kill Beatty. Montag did not command his friend to be involved because it was all his liking to go along with the plan. I would have done the alike if I was in a situation like his, and I have done similar things like this. I would not exploit someone who was a part of my actions for I was the one who was caught. In one quote Montag showed how thoughtful he was:?Montag, get out of there! said Faber. Montag listened. Beatty struck him a soak up on the head that sent him reeling back. The green smoke ?[?]? leave out to the sidewalk. Beatty snatched it up ?[?]? held it one-half in, half out of his ear. Montag hear the long-distance voice calling, Montag you all right? Beatty switched the green bullet off ?[?]? Well---so there?s more here than I thought. ?[?]? We?ll trace this and drop in on your friend. No! said Montag? (page 118-119). This quote showed that Montag did not let down his friend. He would have sacrificed himself to stop Beatty from killing his accomplice. This was the kind of contemplation I would have shown to my friends or accomplice if I was in his situation. All in all, a character in a novel is honest a character portrayed by what the author wants him/her to be. These characters could have many similarities to us varying from personality, carnal features, or even the way we think. Many novels have these characters that have gone through the problems we faced and could connect to us in a way that we can only see. This just goes to show that, even though the character is not real, they still can be a part of you from the way they were portrayed in the novel. BibliographyFahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.